|
|
 |
|
| Volume 120 (6) 2003, pp. 209-272 |
Cover: John
Seebeck at the awarding of his Masters of
Science. Photo by Marion Matthews. |
Biodiversity
Symposium Special Issue
|
|
Table
of Contents
| Biodiversity Papers |
Introduction by Tom May |
212 |
| |
Victorias FFG Act: a
Perspective from the Department of Sustainability
and Environment by Adrian Moorrees
Abstract |
214 |
| |
Has the FFG Act Achieved What
We Hoped? by Phillip Sutton
Abstract |
216 |
| |
The FFG Act 1988 (Vic)
a Toothless Tiger Quoll? by Andrew Walker
Abstract |
224 |
| |
Implementation of the
Threatened Species Conservation Act in NSW by
Graham Wilson
Abstract |
237 |
| |
The Victorian FFG Act and the
Conservation of Communities and Lesser Known
Groups of Biota by Tom May, Tim New, Neville
Walsh and Alan Yen
Abstract |
248 |
| Tributes |
John H. Seebeck by Peter
Menkhorst, Ian Mansergh and Ian Temby |
260 |
| |
Ian McCann by Margaret
Corrick |
262 |
| Honours |
Australian Natural History
Medallion 2003 Colin Minton by Ian
Endersby |
264 |
| Book Reviews |
A Field Guide to the Mammals
of Australia by Peter Menkhorst and Frank
Knight, reviewed by Cath Kemper |
266 |
| |
Spiders and Scorpions by
Ken Walker, Alan Yen and Graham Milledge,
reviewed by Melanie Archer |
267 |
| Legislation |
Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act
1988 |
269 |
Biodiversity
Papers Victorias FFG Act: a Perspective
from the
Department of Sustainability and Environment
Adrian Moorrees
Abstract
This paper discusses the Flora and Fauna
Guarantee Act 1988 from the perspective of the
Department of Sustainability and Environment.
(The Victorian Naturalist 120 (6)
2003, 214-216)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
Has the FFG Act Achieved What We
Hoped?
Phillip
Sutton
Abstract
This paper discusses the Flora and Fauna
Guarantee Act from its introduction in 1988 to
the present, its successes, its failures and
future directions.
(The Victorian Naturalist 120 (6)
2003, 216-223)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
The
FFG Act 1988 (Vic) a Toothless Tiger
Quoll?
Andrew
Walker
Abstract
This paper provides a short summary of the FFG
Act and sets out the key problems with the Act
and its implementation to date. Then LFFs
recommendations for reform of the FFG Act are
summarised.This paper is not, and is not intended
to constitute, legal advice. Comments are of a
general nature only. Readers of this paper should
not act or refrain from acting on the basis of
this paper without first obtaining specific legal
advice.
(The Victorian Naturalist 120 (6)
2003, 224-237)
Back to Table of Contents
|
Implementation
of the Threatened Species Conservation Act in NSW
Graham
Wilson
Abstract
The Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC
Act) came into effect, in NSW, on 1 January 1996.
The TSC Act provides broad protection to
threatened plants and animals, including
invertebrates, but not fish, which are protected
under the Fisheries Management Act 1984 (FM
Act). The Act also allows for the listing
of endangered ecological communities and
endangered populations of species which are not
otherwise endangered, and provides legal
protection to threatened species either from
direct harm to individuals or from damage to
their habitat. An independent scientific
committee is established to determine the lists
of threatened species and threatening processes.
The Act also provides for the preparation of
Recovery Plans and Threat Abatement Plans within
specified timeframes, integrates threatened
species assessment into the assessment provisions
of the Environmental Planning and Assessment
Act 1979 (EP&A Act), and includes other
conservation measures. This paper explains major
provisions of the TSC Act and provides summary
information in regard to its implementation.
Amendments to the TSC Act in 2002 on the basis of
a review by a Joint Select Committee of the NSW
Parliament in 1997 are briefly discussed. As many
of the protective measures within the TSC Act are
given effect through provisions within the National
Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act) these
provisions are also considered. (
The Victorian Naturalist 120 (6),
2003, 237-248).
Back to Table of Contents
|
The
Victorian FFG Act and the Conservation of
Communities
and Lesser Known Groups of Biota
Tom May,
Tim New, Neville Walsh and Alan Yen
Abstract
The Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act was
designed to protect plants and animals through
listing of individual threatened taxa as well as
listing of communities and potentially
threatening processes. This paper is a review of
what the Act has achieved for non-vascular
plants, fungi and invertebrates and also includes
an assessment of the value of community listing
as a surrogate for individual taxon listing in
these highly diverse groups. It is suggested that
listing all threatened taxa in these groups,
which include numerous undescribed taxa, may not
be the most practical strategy for ensuring their
conservation. These lesser known groups may be
better served by first listing a smaller number
of better known threatened taxa, with emphasis on
selected focal groups, while at the same time
putting more resources into listing communities.
The linkage between Department of Sustainability
and Environment threat lists and the Flora and
Fauna Guarantee list are discussed, as is a
proposal for a comprehensive inventory of
Victorian biota. Suggestions on where the Act could
be directed in the future are outlined.
(The Victorian Naturalist 120 (6),
2003, 248-260)
Back to Table of Contents
|
Last modified on 8 May 2008
Back to The Victorian Naturalist main page.
Copyright © The Field
Naturalists Club of Victoria Inc.
|