|
|
 |
 |
Volume 119 (3)
2002, pp. 85-148
Murray
River Special Issue
Part 1
|
Cover:
Morning reflections on a Murray River billabong
near Mildura. Photo by Anne Morton. |
This
issue is dedicated to
Natalie Joanne Smith
(31 May 1974 22 July 2002)
|
|
Table
of Contents
Murray
River Special Issue
Part One |
Introduction, by Terry
Hillman |
86 |
| |
National Parks and Reserves on
the Murray River: an Historical Perspective, by
Daniel Catrice
Abstract |
88 |
| |
Geomorphology of the Murray
River Basin, by Noel Schleiger
Abstract |
95 |
| |
Floodplain Wetlands: the
Jewels of the Murray River, by Rhonda Butcher
and Michael Reid
Abstract
|
102 |
| |
Habitat Change in River Red
Gum Floodplains: Depletion of Fallen Timber and
Impacts on Biodiversity, by Ralph Mac Nally,
Andrea Ballinger and Gregory Horrocks
Abstract
|
107 |
| |
Vertebrate Fauna of Barmah
Forest, a Large Forest of River Red Gum Eucalyptus
camaldulensis on the Floodplain of the Murray
River, by Richard H Loyn, Linda F Lumsden and
Keith A Ward
Abstract |
114 |
| |
The Distribution and
Conservation Status of the Reptile Fauna of the
Murray River Region in Victoria, by Geoff
Brown
Abstract |
133 |
| Book Reviews |
Tadpoles of South-eastern
Australia: a Guide with Keys, by Marion
Anstis, reviewed by Angus Martin |
144 |
| |
Rivers as Ecological Systems:
The Murray-Darling Basin, edited by WJ Young,
reviewed by Gerry Quinn |
147 |
Murray
River Special Issue Part 1
National Parks
and Reserves on the Murray River: an Historical
Perspective
Daniel Catrice
Abstract
Attempts to establish national parks and reserves
along the Murray River occurred late in the
history of Victorias conservation movement.
For much of its recent history the Murray has
been made to serve industry and agriculture. The
first timber reserves and State forests, which
had been set aside from 1869, confirmed a pattern
of exploitation which went largely unquestioned
until well into the twentieth century. This
article looks at settlement and land-use along
the Murray and the efforts of conservation groups
to protect the lands bordering the river from
unregulated development. It concludes with a
brief historical overview of the key parks and
reserves along the river Hattah-Kulkyne,
Murray-Sunset and Alpine National Parks; Barmah
State Park; and Murray Kulkyne Park.
(The Victorian Naturalist 119 (3),
2002, 88-94)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
Geomorphology
of the Murray River Basin
Noel Schleiger
Abstract
The Murray River is an exotic stream. Since
Cretaceous time it has been both a betrunked and,
more recently in the Pliocene, an engrafted river
system. Since the Pliocene, the direction of the
course of the Murray has been influenced by
upfaulting and jointing of the rocks over which
it flows. Geomorphological features such as the
valley-in-valley structure, sharpened spurs,
valley scroll deposits, incised meanders and
valleys, bahadas and prior streams are the direct
consequences of uplift, where the river
rejuvenates its valley to reach its former base
level in its mountain, valley or plain tract.
Features of the plain tract are sinuous meanders,
because of low gradients, with levee banks,
ox-bow lakes, lagoons, anabranches, effluents and
distributaries. Saline ground water entering the
Murray River has created problems for water
management of the Murray. Part of this is due to
irrigation of soils developed on a salty sea bed
in late Miocene and in part due to salty aquifers
being cut by the Murray bed. Aeolian features in
the semi-arid areas of the Riverine Plain of the
Mallee and Wimmera involve parna deposits,
deflated playas, parabolic sand dunes on the
Lowan Sand formation and lunettes on the eastern
shores of drying lakes. These are the product of
a more arid climate in the Pleistocene through to
the present day.
(The Victorian Naturalist 119 (3),
2002, 95-101)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
Floodplain
Wetlands: the Jewels of the Murray River
Rhonda Butcher
and Michael Reid
Abstract
Wetlands and billabongs of the Murray River
floodplain are intimately connected with the
mainstream, and whilst this may imply a degree of
similarity, work over the past 20 years has shown
that this is not necessarily the case. While
billabongs are formed by the river, the physical
and chemical gradients of the river and
floodplain wetlands are quite different and thus
the biological communities are quite different.
This paper briefly describes some of the
ecological differences between the mainstream and
the floodplain wetlands touching on the
importance of connectivity, disturbance, and the
variability of the floodplain communities.
(The Victorian Naturalist 119 (3),
2002, 102-107)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
Habitat Change
in River Red Gum Floodplains: Depletion of Fallen
Timber and Impacts on Biodiversity
Ralph Mac
Nally, Andrea Ballinger and Gregory Horrocks
Abstract
Fallen timber, or coarse woody debris, is a major
habitat structural element for animals and plants
throughout forested areas worldwide. Fallen
timber volumes have been massively manipulated
both through direct means (fire-wood collection,
fuel reduction) and through indirect activities
(silvicultural management preventing trees
reaching senescence). Work in our laboratory has
focused on assessing the extent of fallen timber
depletion in River Red Gum Eucalyptus
camaldulensis floodplain forests of the
southern Murray-Darling Basin. We estimate that
contemporary fallen timber loads average about
16% (about 19 tonne/ha) of loads prior to
European settlement. We also have been
investigating relationships between fallen timber
loads and biodiversity of both vertebrates and
invertebrates. Our observational and experimental
results indicate that loads at least twice
current levels exert a positive influence on a
number of ecologically critical species (e.g.
Yellow-footed Antechinus Antechinus flavipes,
Brown Treecreeper Climacteris picumnus).
Therefore, restoration targets of 4050
tonne/ha seem reasonable objectives for managing
this critical element of habitat structure.
(The Victorian Naturalist 119 (3),
2002, 107-113)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
Vertebrate
Fauna of Barmah Forest, a Large Forest of River
Red Gum Eucalyptus camaldulensis
on the Floodplain of the Murray River
Richard H Loyn,
Linda F Lumsden and Keith A Ward
Abstract
Barmah Forest is part of the largest River Red
Gum forest in the world, and several studies have
examined aspects of its vertebrate fauna in
recent decades. This paper summarises this work
and gives an overview of the forest fauna along
with some historical information and comments on
possible effects of management practices.
Altogether 35 mammal, 205 bird, 20 reptile, 10
frog and 28 fish species have been recorded in or
near Barmah Forest. Bats constitute a high
proportion of the mammal species. Arboreal
mammals are represented by several species in
generally low numbers. The only native rodent is
the aquatic Water Rat, and the only small native
ground-dwelling mammal is partly arboreal
(Yellow-footed Antechinus). The most numerous
ground-dwelling birds are those that can also
feed from other substrates during floods (e.g.
Brown Treecreeper). Three bird species
(White-plumed Honeyeater, Striated Pardalote and
Brown Treecreeper) form a high proportion of
individuals in the bird community (40%). Canopy
feeding insectivores are patchily distributed and
their numbers are negatively correlated with
aggressive White-plumed Honeyeaters, which even
dominate on box ridges. Hollow-nesting birds form
a high proportion (34%) of individuals in the
bird community. The forest is an important
habitat for several threatened species, and for
large numbers of waterbirds, fish and frogs that
breed there during floods. Deep spring floods
provide the best breeding conditions for many of
these species. River regulation, grazing and
logging have all contributed to a range of
historical changes. Mostly anecdotal evidence
suggests loss of some mammal and bird species and
more recent declines in certain waterbirds, frogs
and snakes. The fish fauna is now heavily
dominated by introduced species.
(The Victorian Naturalist 119
(3), 2002, 114-132)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
The
Distribution and Conservation Status of the
Reptile Fauna of the Murray River Region in
Victoria
Geoff Brown
Abstract
The lands surrounding the Murray River, from
source to South Australia, support a remarkable
diversity of terrestrial reptiles. At least
ninety-four species, representing nine families,
are known from the environs of the Murray River
in Victoria, and this fauna consists of a blend
of arid-adapted elements from the north-west with
temperate elements from the east. Species
richness and diversity of regional reptile
assemblages tends to increase along the gradient
from cool mesic (Eastern Highlands) to warm dry
regions (Mallee). Skinks are the dominant
component (44%) of the overall reptile fauna in
terms of number of species. Skinks also exhibit a
distinct decline in proportional species
composition along the environmental gradient from
the east to the north-west, in contrast with
dragons, geckoes and legless lizards, reptile
families that show a steady increase in their
proportional representation. Twenty-four reptile
species known from the Murray River area are
considered threatened in a national or state
(Victoria or New South Wales) context, and at
least another 18 species are considered locally
threatened. The majority of these threatened
species are found in the north-west of the state,
and most are classified as such because they are
either at the limit of their distributional range
in northern Victoria, and consequently occur only
rarely, or because they are habitat specialists
and considered to be disadvantaged by habitat
change or loss. The major determinants of reptile
occurrence (and decline) are briefly discussed.
(The Victorian Naturalist 119
(3), 2002, 133-143)
Back to Table of
Contents
|
Last modified on 26 April 2008
Back to The Victorian Naturalist main page.
Copyright © The Field
Naturalists Club of Victoria Inc.
|